Okay last time we left off with a comment about some mothers wanting or having the urge to kill their new born babies - we were discussing how girls do not have as in-depth of feelings or attachment as men have. Meaning, girls basic biology is self-preservation mainly due to the child rearing needed for her to succeed. Rotating partners to procure offspring from a dominate male naturally defuse deep attachments to her sexual partner in order for her to sleep around in hopes to get knocked up. For this same very reason her evolution of her emotions have evolved to become deceptive and detached from her inner being – seducing or making herself attractive to the alpha males, making the provider males feel loved or cherished in order to help protect the child and herself. Historical evolution has led girls to use her feminine traits for self-preservation only. Her affections evolved over time to appear only on the surface, and would need to be able to change at the first sign of danger, loss of child(ren), loss of alpha seeds or lack of alpha males, loss of provider or tribe. She must ensure that she fulfills the only true deep urges she has – to bear children.
The urge to kill her newborns is not common, but does occur throughout history. In China they will purposely do it with girl babies because girls can’t carry on the family name, and they aren’t as useful in warfare or farming (oh yeah and that one child policy.). But historically, over time, there is a more truthful reason that the majority of these urges come from. From Psychology Wiki:
A number of academics attribute it, both modern and historical, to psychological inability to raise children. Contemporary data suggests that modern filicide is sometimes brought about by a psychological unreadiness to raise children.[How to reference and link to summary or text] It could also be exacerbated by schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. It is also attributed, in some cases, to the desire of unwed, underage parents to conceal their sexual relations and/or avoid the responsibility of childrearing
To conceal their sexual relations… or as I am guessing, to conceal their cuckholdery or failed cuckholdery. Women who slept with an alpha in order to garner the best genes for her offspring plop out an infant that looks like the beta provider she was trying to cuckhold. Her urge is to kill the thing. Why? They say the bond between mother and baby is the strongest bond in the world. Why would this matter? The bond is only strong if it’s the child she desired. If it is not, it is a repulsive burden. If she let’s it live, it will be harassed with her spite for its entire growing up phase.
A child may be loved by its mother unconditionally, but only if it benefits her. So yes, the child she wants, will receive unconditional love. The spite comes in when the child is a bitter reminder of her inability to procure her desired seed. She will have the feeling of a failure of a woman.
The child to a girl is a placard of herself to be shown to the world, a direct result of the highest quality genes she was able to have deposited in her. Her and the children are no longer separate entities, the children are the extension of her. In truth a woman is not complete until she has children. A boy with an alpha, sexy kid to procreate with the most females, a girl, a biological extension of her to procure the highest alpha she can get.
Men on the other hand, their children are their legacy. He wants them to be the best they can be, carry on traditions of the family, or to carry on the nobility he partakes on them. His affection for them runs deep, he is the fierce protector of them, he cares about their development of them as people, prepares them for the world that he knows exists on a wider plane than girls do. He understands the world as it is, that it is not for his personal enjoyment, but something larger, something to give to. His self-esteem is based not on what he is, but what he does, it is not how his kids look, or perform, but how capable they are to contribute to society. A man bonds with his kids as human beings with a new set of attributes and traits – he wants them to be better than he was, he wants them to surpass him. No man will ever be good enough for his little girl, in fact the more alpha the more he will protect her from him – a boy will become something transcendent of him – a potential that he could not fill. He will want them to be better than the couple that birthed them.
Girls cannot help but be what there are, no more than men can be. Biology speaks for itself, girls evolved out of necessary to be selfish and subversive. Using the only powers she has to ensure she procreates and her children will survive.
She may have friends, they may seem to do everything with one another and tell her friends everything, but her relationships with other girls is undermined by her fierce competition with every other girl. She will not hesitate to cast her friends aside, or scratch their eyes out if there is an alpha competing for her and her friends affections.
To be continued…